A person may validly serve any document on the company at its previous. I am signing this form on behalf of the company. T his form may be signed by:. Administrative receiver , Receiver , Receiver manager , Charity commission receiver.
Please make sure you have r emembered the. T he company name and number match the. England and Wales ,. W ales, Scotland, Northern Ireland. Y ou have signed the form. Y ou may return this form to any Companies House. F or companies registered in England and W ales:. T he Registrar of Companies, Companies House ,. F or companies registered in Scotland:. F or companies registered in Northern Ir eland:. DX N.
Belfast 1. F or further information, please see the guidance notes. T his form is av ailable in an. Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a Technical Risk Management process to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation for management of the risk identified during the technical effort.
Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a Configuration Management process to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation for configuration management. The technical products to be controlled are identified and tracked to ensure that the team knows what the configuration of their system is at all phases of the life cycle.
Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a Technical Data Management process to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation for management of the technical data generated and used in the technical effort. This will include all data needed to manage, operate, and support the system products over the life cycle. It ensures that the data is available and secure when needed. Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a Technical Assessment process to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation for making assessments of the progress of planned technical effort and progress toward requirements satisfaction.
Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a Decision Analysis process to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation for making technical decisions. This requirement ensures that the Centers identify how they will make and document key technical decisions.
It helps to ensure that all team members know who can make decisions, what their authority levels are, and where to go to gain an understanding of what key decisions have been made. For those requirements owned by Center Directors, the technical team shall complete the compliance matrix in Appendix H.
For programs and projects, the compliance matrix in Appendix H. The DGA shall approve the SEMP, waiver authorizations, and other key technical documents to ensure independent assessment of technical content. The DGA, who is often the TA, provides an approval of the SEMPs, waivers to technical requirements and other key technical document to provide assurance of the applicability and technical quality of the products. The NASA technical team shall define the engineering activities for the periods before contract award, during contract performance, and upon contract completion in the SEMP.
It is important for both the Government and contractor technical teams to understand what activities will be handled by which organization throughout the product life cycle. The contractor s will typically develop a SEMP or its equivalent to describe the technical activities in their portion of the project, but an overarching SEMP is needed that will describe all technical activities across the life cycle whether contracted or not.
The NASA technical team shall use common technical processes, as implemented by the Center's documentation, to establish the technical inputs to the RFP appropriate for the product to be developed, including product requirements and Statement of Work tasks.
The technical team's participation in the development of the RFP is critical to enabling a successful contracted effort. Ensuring that the proper application of the common technical processes into the contracted effort will enhance the chances for success.
The NASA technical team shall determine the technical work products to be delivered by the offeror or contractor, to include a contractor SEMP that specifies the contractor's systems engineering approach for requirements development; technical solution definition; design realization; product evaluation; product transition; and technical planning, control, assessment, and decision analysis.
The technical team is in the best position to determine what kind of work products from the technical effort will need to be delivered. These products will eventually be used by the technical team to determine the suitability of the contracted effort in its ability to meet requirements, satisfy the stakeholder expectations, and perform as planned. In addition to the work description and products to be delivered, how the technical team will gain an adequate understanding of the contracted work, what authority if any they will have to direct or influence the work, and their participation at key milestone reviews.
The NASA technical team shall participate in the review s to finalize Government acceptance of the deliverables. Per the agreement in the SEMP and the contract, the technical team will participate in the milestone reviews. In accordance with the SEMP, the technical team will participate in the execution of the final aspects of the end product?? These activities may be performed by the same team that was involved in its development or by other technical teams.
The technical team shall develop and document plans for life-cycle and technical reviews for use in the project planning process. The technical team shall conduct the life-cycle and technical reviews as indicated in the governing project management NPR. The technical team will be responsible for generating and presenting many of the technical topics during a life-cycle and technical review. The technical team shall participate in the development of entrance and success criteria for each of the respective reviews.
The entrance and success criteria in Appendix G are provided as guidelines not requirements except where notated.
Specific names of documents may be provided for clarity, non-applicable products eliminated, and new products added as needed for clarity and completeness. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: MCR: Baselined stakeholder identification and expectation definitions.
For a MCR one of the key products is capturing the stakeholder expectations. These may be identified as needs, goals, and objectives, or other methods for capturing their expectations. After all comments from the MCR are dispositioned, the set of stakeholder expectations are updated with the approved comments and then baselined.
The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: MCR: Baselined concept definition. Presenting one or more feasible ways of accomplishing the stakeholder expectations is a key product of the MCR. After all comments from the MCR are dispositioned, the concept s are updated with the approved comments and then baselined. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: MCR: Approved MOE definition.
The Measures of Effectiveness capture the stakeholder's view of what would be considered the successful achievement of each expectation. These will help in the later identification of requirements, criteria for trade studies and in the success criteria for the validation efforts.
The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: SRR: Baselined SEMP for projects, single-project programs, and one-step AO programs. For projects, single-project programs, and one-step AO programs after all comments from the SRR are dispositioned, the SEMP is updated with the approved comments and then baselined. The SEMP is baselined in a later phase for the other types of programs and so will be a "Not Applicable" in this line for uncoupled, tightly coupled, and loosely coupled programs.
The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: SRR: Baselined requirements. After all comments from the SRR are dispositioned, the requirements are updated with the approved comments and then baselined.
These may be associated with the key driving requirements, key performance parameters, leading or lagging indicators, or other measures that are important to periodically measure and track. One of the key products of a SDR is the proposed architecture that will accomplish the requirements. After all comments from the SDR are dispositioned, the architecture description is updated with the approved comments and then baselined. Now that the overarching architecture has been defined, it is important to show how the requirements are allocated to the architecture elements of the next lower level of the product hierarchy.
After all comments from the SDR are dispositioned, the allocation is updated with the approved comments and then baselined. These will typically be in graphical form but could also be tabular or other form appropriate for the project.
Since final hardware has not been produced at this point, the trends will be on the estimated parameters. The SEMP is a key document for the technical effort in a similar manner that the program plan captures the programmatic efforts. The SEMP is baselined in an earlier phase for projects and single-project programs and so will be a "Not Applicable" in this line for those types of programs. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: PDR: Preliminary design solution definition.
The key product of a PDR is the preliminary design itself. The design is captured in one or documents, models, databases, drawings, and other means. Comments from the PDR will be captured in the final design for the next review.
The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: CDR: Baseline detailed design.
The key product of a CDR is the final design. The design is captured in one or more documents, models, databases, drawings, and other means. The final design is updated with approved comments from the review, and the design is updated to represent the design that will be implemented. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: SIR: Updated integration plan.
A key product of a SIR is the updated integration plans. These will describe how the products associated with this review will be integrated. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: SIR: Preliminary VandV results. Another key product of a SIR is the initial VandV results from any of the lower level products that are associated with this review.
So, prior to integration into larger assemblies, lower level products will have been through their VandV activities. This ensures that, when they are assembled into the higher product layers, they will work as intended. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: ORR: Updated operational plans.
This is to ensure that all stakeholders are aware and approve of these plans. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: ORR: Updated operational procedures.
This is to ensure that all stakeholders are aware and approve of these procedures. The technical team shall provide the following minimum products at the associated milestone review at the indicated maturity level: ORR: Preliminary decommissioning plans.
AT ORR it is important to describe how the product will ultimately be decommissioned when it has accomplished its mission. This is to ensure that decommissioning will be feasible before the product is put into use.
After all comments from the ORR are dispositioned, the plan is updated with the approved comments and then baselined.
0コメント